About your Search

20121112
20121112
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5
in the national interest to clear out the mess that labor left us, particularly in driving unemployment down, let me just pick one constituent city, in corby, it went down 4.6% last month. >> for the first time in my parliamentary career, i wholeheartedly agree with him. let's just savor and treasure this moment. because i suspect it will be very, very rare, indeed. but i like it when i heard the honorable member had been sent to a jungle to eat insects, i thought despite the appearance of civility from my new chief whip this indicated a new disciplinaryian approach in our whip's office and i totally agree with him we are doing a great job together to fix the economy and great jobs for people in the future and that's a great shared endeavor. >> you've been watching prime minister's questions from the british house of commons. question time airs live on c-span 2 every wednesday at 7:00 a.m. eastern when the house of commons is in session, and again on sunday nights at 9:00 p.m. eastern and pacific on c-span. next week, members are out for a short autumn re-recess. question time returns on wednesda
parliamentary career i wholeheartedly agree with him. [laughter] let us favor and treasure this moment. [laughter] because i suspect it will be very, very rare indeed. but when i heard the honorable member had been sent to a jungle with insects, i thought that despite the appearance of civility from our new chief whip, this indicates a new disciplinarian approach in the chief whip's office. i agree with and we're doing a great job to go to fix the econ >> next week, members are out for a short autumn recess. question time returns on wednesday, november 21, 20123. watch "any time" at c-span "org where you can find british prime minister's questions and other public affairs programs. >> prime minister david cameron gives a speech at the lord mayor banquet. >> i enjoy watching book tv and the rebroadcast of various television news programs. c-span provides end-to-end coverage of events and the kind of editing you see from other programs and gives you an opportunity to consume the news and information and make up my own mind about what's going on. c-span is a great way to get a kind of unf
the system. it is impossible for us to keep an accurate accounting of how many did not. i will tell you that at the board of veterans' appeals, we keep track of the claims that are returned. it breaks down how many claims every year. they did not break them down by the power of attorney for each organization. >> my bet is your offices are doing a great job. if it is working so successfully, maybe there is an opportunity to streamline its even more. if your are having a very high success rate, maybe there is a way to look at the process and slim it down a little bit. your rate of success should be a benefit to you and the veterans who are receiving it. we asked them for the number yesterday it. we expect to receive them shortly. >> we share that with us individually? that would help us make the case for why your service officers can process this. i'm a the be a duplicate some of the work. it is like maybe we can cut some of that bout. maybe you can get some comments on this. i know it is a big issue. we are shoveling on the armed services committee. we have been successful in getting men
limited in trying to play stump the band and is us complicated questions about obscure subcommittees, but in general the macro narrative about these chairmanships is that the house republicans, way back in 1994 when they came out of the minority for the first time in 40 years, one of their reforms is to impose six-year term limits. they felt the old democratic system in place from the late 1950's through the early 1990's of seniority being paramount and these old white guys taking the gavels in their 50's and hanging on to them until their 70's was a bad idea. they imposed these limits and they have stuck. as a result there will be another generational turnover on the house side. not so much the senate side. >> what is fortunate point out is that there will be a certain amount of turnover. it is kind of like what happened in california. they just start running for other offices. you know that is one of the reasons the young mayor of los angeles. you know, it does inject a lost talent into positions you would not necessarily think of, but it does create problems because some of the pe
election. host: hillary clinton would be the best prepared candidate. one who has lived in the u.s. senate, a woman who knows virtually every head of state in the world and is a strong opinion of the inclusion of -- social inclusion. i come close but will not talk about that until hillary -- people decide what to do. >> what is your decision making process moving forward -- her process moving card forward? guest: i supported her in 2008 over barack obama. she ran for president, i would be very excited. i have to say i played for time out. here is what is wrong. if we in the media start speculating right now about 2016, even about 2014, we're not doing our jobs. i got to say that because what is wrong with this country is a perpetual campaign. it is not supposed to work that way. you have a campaign and you fought like hell for you believe then and you win or lose in the new take time out to govern. that is what these people across the street have to do. not in campaign mode but in governing mode. six problems, especially the fiscal and immigration reform. i sound like i am preaching the ta
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)